Saturday, July 4, 2009

Curious

This past week, my friend and co-conspirator in writing about political and cultural issues, Deb, put up a new post on a web site that she and I a few others contribute to. She was motivated, in this instance, by the dismissal of Lt. Dan Choi, for openly defying the terms of the DADT policy in our military. You can read it here: http://turn-left.hypocrisy.com/2009/07/01/the-injustice-continues-under-obama/.

As you might guess, the article expresses Deb’s displeasure with the military’s decision concerning Lt. Choi, as well as the general direction of affairs relative to the country in general, President Obama’s inactions and the LGBT community. She makes a very good case (as usual) and concludes by saying that the President is a “political coward”, and that “is not what the country needed”.

Now you should know that Deb is a very vociferous member of the LGBT community so it is not difficult to understand her basic position. And I was very much in general agreement with her, but I did not feel her statement went far enough. So I wrote this:

Before this post becomes the source of vitriol that swirls around solely LGBT/homo-angstian rhetoric, and some of the readers here climb all over Deb for per position, I must say that I think she is both right and wrong. Her outrage and indignation over the handling of Dan Choi( and DADT in general) is apt and well placed. But she is wrong in overlooking its' symbolic value, as regards the actions (or inactions) of the Obama administration on the whole.

Injustice is probably not the best word we could use here, and I'll tell you why. The outcome of the Choi hearing, as well as the President's comment to a retired Air Force officer, that this was a "generational issue" smack of the same position of mediocrity, appeasement, glad handing and moral molly-coddling that is evidenced by his stance on every major issue confronting us today: the financial debacle, the economy in general, LGBT rights, foreign policy issues (Israel/Palestine, Honduras), government secrecy and the biggest elephant in the room, health care. And Deb's conclusion that this stance is political cowardice may not be the more appropriate word , either.

What we do have a a betrayal of promised leadership and a strange and curious sudden lack of courage.Five to six months in or no, we were promised change. But, alas the world is of full of promise keepers/breakers: Ensign, Sanford, Pelosi (who lead her legislative body), Reid (who would lead his party), Bush who promised to be a uniter and a decider and was neither.

Obama appears to lack the courage to do the extraordinary so that the ordinary and necessary and morally correct may occur. He is languishing in a sea of mediocrity and half-baked actions.

If you want something worthwhile to occur, the required action must have some spectacular and extraordinary transformations accompanying it so that there will be a valuable and lasting effect. If you want to burn down a building, you have to start a fire and be prepared for the heat.

If you want to bake leavened bread, you must scald then milk befor you add it to the mixture or else the the microbes in the milk will kill the bacteria in the yeast and the bread will not rise. You will still get bread, but if you don't scald the milk first, but the bread will be flat, hard and disappointing. If you use only tepid water to make tea, instead of boiling water, you will still get tea but it will be weak and unappealing.

Obama needs to stop walking down the middle of the road, stop trying to appease and accomodate everyone, stop not trying not ruffle feathers , incorporating every side on every issue, take a firm stand, piss off a few people on the outer edges, stop pretending to be Solomon and make some strong tea and some substatial, chewable bread.

Injustice and cowardice? I think not. But mediocre fence-straddling and a lack of conviction to cause the extraordinary may be more like it, and Dan Choi is only one example of convictional terpitude.


A postscript:

Almost without fail, Deb’s posts get lambasted and attacked by a select group of right-wingnut, conservative, nearly illiterate, unabashed homophobes who attack her comments almost solely because of her sexual orientation. I posted my comments almost immediately and several days have passed. There has been no rhetorical firestorm or rebuttal from any front. I wonder why that is?

Friday, July 3, 2009

July Fourth Special

Here are some holiday suggestions for ways to utilize the summer’s unfolding events and organize your priorities, so far. As you set off your firecrackers and bottle rockets, and 500 G military artillery shells (like we do here in Texas), and grill your steaks and hot dogs, and munch on watermelon, try a few of these observations on for size.

If you have watched the television at all, lately, you have probably noticed advertising for:

-Independent trade schools urging people to go back to school to learn new skills in law enforcement (municipalities have no money to fund these jobs), electrical/construction trades (the housing construction industry has crashed, nationwide), long-haul truck driving and drafting. There are no jobs to be had in these fields, but we are encouraged to take out student loans and go deeper into debt, anyway. And be sure to eat at McDonald’s every day, between classes. Then you can spend what you have left on an expensive weight-loss program. Google Dan Merino.

-Learning to use tools like PC-based stock trading programs to play the stock market or else run right down to the local office of your friendly neighborhood broker, to discuss re-managing your empty portfolio (on July 3, the DOW closed down about 225+ points…again). All we have to play with is monopoly money: we may as well have fun with it. Paper re-cycling bins are full of shredded 401k statements.
-A rash of new extended warranty companies who want to you pay large amounts of money to protect you from financial ruin if your “older” car breaks down. They know you can’t afford a new car, but want you to believe that a monthly payment to them (about the size of a small car payment) will protect you from the financial ruin roughly equal to not having adequate health insurance. If not that, then run out and take advantage of low-cost 60 month financing on a new vehicle that will no longer be manufactured by Genera l Motors. Or get guaranteed payments on a new car from Korea if you lose your job in the next few weeks or months.

-Immediately changing your auto insurance policy from company A to company B, because company A is surely charging you too much and company B has a much better payment plan. The combined monies that Progressive, Geico, State Farm, et.al. are spending on TV ads could finance the war in Iraq. And their rates go up, daily.

So let’s change gears. Before you get caught up in worrying about Darfur, Iraq, Afghanistan, Honduras, un-health care, North Korea, the imminent crises concerning world food supplies and water or the fact that the Obama presidency has the remarkable look of being the mirror opposite of the Obama campaign, kick around a few of these entertaining activities:

Stay mesmerized by the meaning less and irrelevant death of Michael Jackson. He has does nothing but represent the bizarre, financially irresponsible and macabre and molest children for the last decade or so. Maybe we can spend more time talking about it and maybe you can contribute to the already bankrupt city of Los Angeles to help pay for his “memorial service”. Are we that stupid?

Keep your imagination titillated by speculating on the real reasons behind why Sarah Palin is resigning. This is, in all likelihood, a preemptive strike to get her out of the line of fire before some Inuit Eskimo Exxon baby seal scandal erupts or that we find out that her hubby is not Trig’s father. Or John Ensign is. Or that she got an STD from Mark Sanford in Argentina. Which she can see from her front porch. And she has done nothing but produce and intellectually molest children for the last decade or so, either. Are we that bored? Gullible?

And if you are still without enough diversionary fluff to keep you busy, run on down to Wal-Mart and buy a new HD flat-panel TV(on credit) and jump into the fray about whether or not to get Direct TV, Dish Network or Cable( I receive junk mail from all three of these four out of seven days a week. What tye spend on this marketing could pay my mortgage without batting an eye and they want rate increases) Then you can decide at the same time if you should bundle your telephone land line with the charges that you are about to be hit with by TimeWarner to surf the net and buy more stuff from the Home Shopping Network… or sell your old TV at a profit through ebay (after you buy the computer training program from the guy on TV who says he won’t make you rich but wants your money for some CD training disks). It’s fun. Really.

And don’t forget to take your gun to Church when you go the day after the fireworks and be sure to watch Fox News , so that you can ineffectively discuss DADT and DOMA and Officer Choi. And Michael Jackson is still dead. Really.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Follow up

A few days ago I wrote a blog entry called "Inharmonious". In it, I sent along some remarks from Mssrs. Krugman and Reich about the shortcomings of Obama's response to the financial debacle we have on-going. I said that I wondered what Galbraith and Grieder might have to say. Well, here is Mr Grieder, weighing in.

He says, essentially, if we settle for weak solutions too soon, because the severity of the crisis seems over, it will be a terrible mistake. Seems awfully hard with which to argue. It is time to dig in our heels, not go out for ice cream.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090706/greider2?rel=emailNation

Reverse Psychosis

A few months ago, a new feature, “Schott’s Vocabulary”, appeared as daily insertion on the Op-Ed page of the NYT. You can also access it directly on the web , here: http://www.benschott.com/.

As a “word guy”, I have been getting a lot of enjoyment from this effort on a daily basis. The column works well as social commentary, cultural analysis and very often provides a balanced view of the contrasts in contemporary international behavior. In short, if you can be honest enough with yourself, what Mr. Schott offers can help you see yourself much more clearly, against the backdrop of today’s larger humanitarian canvass( which is increasingly convoluted ,or a “convass”?).

Today’s entry is especially revealing , given the ongoing, cyclical and embarrassing debacle on Wall St., the current discussions about potential bonuses at Goldman Sachs and the state of bailouts for failing giants like General Motors:
http://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/22/poorgeoisie/?emc=eta1.

The “Poorgeoisie” seem to be out latest segment of self-delusionary, narcissistic and neurotic ne’er do wells, fooling only themselves. I first began thinking of these folks as using “reverse psychology”, practicing a mode of appearance designed to deceive the rest of the American public about their imagined “plight”, but then I settled on the word “psychosis” instead: they are practicing on themselves. These titans/giants/worker bees of the our financial system are, frighteningly and given the reins they hold, acting in a fashion which might be best described as mentally ill. They might be thought of as dangerous. They are perhaps psychotic. Thinking inversely.

Spending untold amounts of money in order to appear “poor” and/or “downtrodden” is apparently Wall St.’s version of credit card splurge: ignore reality, re-package absurdity and live in a personal never-never land that avoids the ugliness which constitutes what has become the essence of daily life for most Americans. If you sing, ”Life is Just a Bowl of Cherries” loud enough, while wearing $300.00,pre-frayed jeans, as you exit your sadly two year-old Porsche, perhaps no one will suspect you had caviar for breakfast, on the rooftop patio of your $2M Manhattan condo. Life for them is still a “cabaret,my friends”. Is it any wonder that, given this sort of disparity in the perception of “real life”, we are having trouble getting back on our feet? Or even finding out feet?

I tried to get an appointment to see my therapist about this, but he was booked. He is getting new patches sewn onto the elbows of his linen shirts and getting his Gucci loafers pre-scuffed.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Acronymns

Due in large part (I understand) to the nearly illiterate communications skills of Paris Hilton (someone called her "Perez" Hilton in an email to me the other day...as in Simon Perez? Scarey), many young people, on the MySpace, Facebook and Twitter sites call many people their "BFF"s. This ostensibly means "Best Friend Forever". While an endearing term (in the moment, anyway), logically speaking, this condition is both probably and literally impossible.

By now I am certain that everyone knows the embarrassing and scandalous plight of Sen. John Ensign (R-NV), a now-disgraced member of congress who was, while for sometime being separated from his wife, had an long running affair with an employee, who was the wife of another employee... and also during that same time employeed the woman's 19 year-old son as a policy "consultant", all of this done with public funds and while he was an elected representative of the people of Nevada. The Senator can truly multi-task.

Senator Ensign is a member of the extremely conservative Four Square pentecostal church, a sworn member of Promise Keepers ("marriage is sacred and sancrosanct")and has (as we now can know) loudly and hypocritically protested the "immoral" and "despicable" behaviors of Bill Clinton and Sens. Craig and Vitter (Bill Maher has pointed out that during his campaign, the Senator refused to be alone in a car with another woman [not his wife], for appearance sakes, but apparently being "in" another woman without a car was acceptable behavior. Go figure) . He "came out" only after the husband of the "in flagrante" woman in question threatened both public exposure and extortion. The Senator has betrayed himself, his church, his matrimonial fraternity, his wife and his constituents.

In my book (Face,Place, Space or otherwise) this makes Sen. Ensign a "MMF", or "Miserable MotherFu@#er", of which he is quite literally both.

Vindications of the Senator are no doubt about to be forthcoming from Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly, and "MMF" works well in the abbreviated text of Twitter.

Have a nice day... with your neighbor's wife.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Inharmonious

Both Paul Krugman (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/19/opinion/19krugman.html?_r=1&th&emc=th)
this morning in the NYT, and Robert Reich (http://robertreich.blogspot.com/)
in his blog posted on 6/18, indicate that they are not happy with the compromise and short-sighted nature of Obama’s proposals for over-hauling the economy and our financial policies. They both indicate that the proposal is not real reform or even anything like it. The news reports on NPR (npr.org) and other articles in the NYT and the WaPo would seem to express the same disappointment. I would like to hear what both Galbraith and Greider have to say, but I have not found anything yet this morning. My first guess is that they would both concur with Krugman and Reich, and that Grieder will be much more pessimistic and critical. And I am willing to bet that Bill Maher (Real Time, HBO, Fri. nite, 10:00 P.M.EST) will have grand time with this debacle tonight.

David Sirota has a piece in Truthdig this morning (http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090618_daring_to_dream/) and I have entered a long comment there, about governmental small thinking, semantics ( you cannot literally “re-invent” anything) and the fact that if we do not come up with some new ideas, new solutions and new approaches to the challenges of the modern world, we will be constrained to remain Neanderthals, waiting for the return of the ice age of human ideological survival. That age will be financed, of course, by Lehman Bros. and have really piss poor health care.

Happy Juneteenth.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

The Man Who Isn't Here

There may well be some terrible and urgent truth to the saying, “The more things change, the more they stay the same”. The word ‘change” stings harshly this morning. The President is not here: he is in France, or Cairo or Buchenwald or Canton or Green Bay. Or on a date night. In reality he has been thrown into a toy store. Like W was, he has so many toys to play with, that he appears overwhelmed. He plays with each economic or military toy just enough to leave is fingerprints on them but not enough to learn to use any effectively enough to bring about change. I had hoped for better.

http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/yes-i-can/?ref=opinion. I was just thinking a few days ago, the President keeps talking about “my” Secretary of State, “my “ Secretary of Defense and “my” financial advisors. Funny: I thought they were “our” government officials and employees. I don’t much care to see Obama’s birth certificate, but I would like to see the bill of sale that shows that we sold him the whole country. His ego (like W’s) suddenly runneth over, he has appears to have forgotten he got hired for this job (not annointed) and works for us. He did not buy the United States like he bought General Motors. I hope he does not sell us to the Italians.
http://progressive.org/wx060909.html. Emanuel does not only appear undisciplined, but seems like the reincarnation of Karl Rove, the junkyard dog. He is unpredictably brash and his behavior betrays bias, brusqueness and angry aggression. He is as reassuring and comforting as falling into a prickly pear. As a right hand man for change, he belies a left-handed skullduggery-business-as- usual. He is a brutal reaffirmation of the politics-as-usual status quo. He is very much here, the President is not.
http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/21632. This is just one essay that describes why the POTUS is all “all hat and no cattle”. His speeches, though eloquent and carefully crafted, lack substance and follow-though. We just spent eight years receiving the same disinformation from W, except it came in the form of sentence fragments and poor grammar. “Walking the walk” is very hard to do when you are not even in the room.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31232667/
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/140570/stop_being_distracted_by_loudmouths_like_limbaugh%3A_the_real_problem_is_lousy_democrats_like_evan_bayh_and_ben_nelson/.
http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/140489/we%27re_screwed_on_everything_from_health_care_to_the_economy_if_the_dems_don%27t_shape_up/
http://www.alternet.org/world/140526/bill_moyers%3A_the_rise_of_private_armies_--_mercenaries%2C_murder_and_corruption_in_iraq_and_afghanistan/
I know this is more material than you want to read (or attempt to) in one sitting. But the sum and substance is roughly this: Show business, glitz, glamour and razzle-dazzle are alive and well with this Presidency, as in the last. The promised change, transparency and grit are totally absent, glossed over and hidden by flowery speeches and dog and pony shows. The President goes today to Green Bay, WI, to talk up health care reform. Why? To what end? This will help this cause as much as his trip to Elkhart, IN helped to re-vitalize the RV industry. Someone should remind him that he promised to actually listen to the citizenry and not stage-manage a diversionary tactic that tries to hide the nasty ambitions of big health and big pharma. He is not here. He is out to lunch while the legislators have lunch with the AMA, Eli Lilly and Pfizer.

The real problem is lousy democrats. Well, doh. The president exerts none of the sway of his office over his own party members, who are still wedded to big industry and finance. Did he learn nothing from Ronald Reagan? He welcomes the traitor-like likes of Arlen Specter, does nothing to limit the incoherencies of Nancy and Harry and Louise and offers no resistance to the Blue Dogs, who are more cur dogs than blue. And he should pull Lieberman and Graham into the Oval Office and read them the disciplinary riot act that is so long over-due. We are screwed…if the democrats don’t shape up. Same story, new page. The President fails repeatedly to listen to wise observers like Grieder and Richard Wolff and Krugman, who might make a difference and enable real change, and instead surrounds himself with old-line defenders of the “way things used to be”, like Biden, Geithner, and Jaba the Summers and uses Hillary Clinton as a lightning rod and innocuous pacifier.

Private armies and mercenaries: The wars and rumors of wars rage on and continue international carnage and promote ill-will, no matter what vagaries the President spouts from a pulpit in Cairo. At the current rate of the loss of hope and procrastination of change, Guantanamo will still be open for business in two years, new black-ops detention/torture centers will be open in other locales and we will soon own a second billion dollar embassy/fortress/stronghold in Afghanistan. Think what you will about the Taliban, Pakistan and nuclear weapons proliferation.

The youngish rising star of Midwestern politics strode onto the scene and emailed and twittered and sweet-talked his way into the hearts and minds of the younger voting populace. Then, through his promises and spell-binding “speechifyin’” ( stunning in contrast to his predecessor I see now in retrospect), he made the boomers stand at the window in the maternity ward and gloat over the newborn in the crib, up front and center. He was there for that.
The economic slide is still sliding, the foreclosures are closing in on human habitation, and, in a fashion no less blatant in its use of distractions, fanfare and hoopla than that of the previous administration, there is no evidence of new thinking and new solutions to new problems which have outgrown and overwhelmed the old approaches. As this possible” new way forward” is ignored, any real opportunity for that once super-hyped hope and change will rapidly fade. Where is that guy?

Obama is the man who is not here. I know that many people hate to hear me say this, but I have to agree with Mr. Greider: if Mr. Obama does not get on the stick, if he does not start singing from the songbook he sang from to get elected, and dancing with the girls who brung him, we are screwed.