A few months ago, a new feature, “Schott’s Vocabulary”, appeared as daily insertion on the Op-Ed page of the NYT. You can also access it directly on the web , here: http://www.benschott.com/.
As a “word guy”, I have been getting a lot of enjoyment from this effort on a daily basis. The column works well as social commentary, cultural analysis and very often provides a balanced view of the contrasts in contemporary international behavior. In short, if you can be honest enough with yourself, what Mr. Schott offers can help you see yourself much more clearly, against the backdrop of today’s larger humanitarian canvass( which is increasingly convoluted ,or a “convass”?).
Today’s entry is especially revealing , given the ongoing, cyclical and embarrassing debacle on Wall St., the current discussions about potential bonuses at Goldman Sachs and the state of bailouts for failing giants like General Motors:
http://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/22/poorgeoisie/?emc=eta1.
The “Poorgeoisie” seem to be out latest segment of self-delusionary, narcissistic and neurotic ne’er do wells, fooling only themselves. I first began thinking of these folks as using “reverse psychology”, practicing a mode of appearance designed to deceive the rest of the American public about their imagined “plight”, but then I settled on the word “psychosis” instead: they are practicing on themselves. These titans/giants/worker bees of the our financial system are, frighteningly and given the reins they hold, acting in a fashion which might be best described as mentally ill. They might be thought of as dangerous. They are perhaps psychotic. Thinking inversely.
Spending untold amounts of money in order to appear “poor” and/or “downtrodden” is apparently Wall St.’s version of credit card splurge: ignore reality, re-package absurdity and live in a personal never-never land that avoids the ugliness which constitutes what has become the essence of daily life for most Americans. If you sing, ”Life is Just a Bowl of Cherries” loud enough, while wearing $300.00,pre-frayed jeans, as you exit your sadly two year-old Porsche, perhaps no one will suspect you had caviar for breakfast, on the rooftop patio of your $2M Manhattan condo. Life for them is still a “cabaret,my friends”. Is it any wonder that, given this sort of disparity in the perception of “real life”, we are having trouble getting back on our feet? Or even finding out feet?
I tried to get an appointment to see my therapist about this, but he was booked. He is getting new patches sewn onto the elbows of his linen shirts and getting his Gucci loafers pre-scuffed.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Acronymns
Due in large part (I understand) to the nearly illiterate communications skills of Paris Hilton (someone called her "Perez" Hilton in an email to me the other day...as in Simon Perez? Scarey), many young people, on the MySpace, Facebook and Twitter sites call many people their "BFF"s. This ostensibly means "Best Friend Forever". While an endearing term (in the moment, anyway), logically speaking, this condition is both probably and literally impossible.
By now I am certain that everyone knows the embarrassing and scandalous plight of Sen. John Ensign (R-NV), a now-disgraced member of congress who was, while for sometime being separated from his wife, had an long running affair with an employee, who was the wife of another employee... and also during that same time employeed the woman's 19 year-old son as a policy "consultant", all of this done with public funds and while he was an elected representative of the people of Nevada. The Senator can truly multi-task.
Senator Ensign is a member of the extremely conservative Four Square pentecostal church, a sworn member of Promise Keepers ("marriage is sacred and sancrosanct")and has (as we now can know) loudly and hypocritically protested the "immoral" and "despicable" behaviors of Bill Clinton and Sens. Craig and Vitter (Bill Maher has pointed out that during his campaign, the Senator refused to be alone in a car with another woman [not his wife], for appearance sakes, but apparently being "in" another woman without a car was acceptable behavior. Go figure) . He "came out" only after the husband of the "in flagrante" woman in question threatened both public exposure and extortion. The Senator has betrayed himself, his church, his matrimonial fraternity, his wife and his constituents.
In my book (Face,Place, Space or otherwise) this makes Sen. Ensign a "MMF", or "Miserable MotherFu@#er", of which he is quite literally both.
Vindications of the Senator are no doubt about to be forthcoming from Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly, and "MMF" works well in the abbreviated text of Twitter.
Have a nice day... with your neighbor's wife.
By now I am certain that everyone knows the embarrassing and scandalous plight of Sen. John Ensign (R-NV), a now-disgraced member of congress who was, while for sometime being separated from his wife, had an long running affair with an employee, who was the wife of another employee... and also during that same time employeed the woman's 19 year-old son as a policy "consultant", all of this done with public funds and while he was an elected representative of the people of Nevada. The Senator can truly multi-task.
Senator Ensign is a member of the extremely conservative Four Square pentecostal church, a sworn member of Promise Keepers ("marriage is sacred and sancrosanct")and has (as we now can know) loudly and hypocritically protested the "immoral" and "despicable" behaviors of Bill Clinton and Sens. Craig and Vitter (Bill Maher has pointed out that during his campaign, the Senator refused to be alone in a car with another woman [not his wife], for appearance sakes, but apparently being "in" another woman without a car was acceptable behavior. Go figure) . He "came out" only after the husband of the "in flagrante" woman in question threatened both public exposure and extortion. The Senator has betrayed himself, his church, his matrimonial fraternity, his wife and his constituents.
In my book (Face,Place, Space or otherwise) this makes Sen. Ensign a "MMF", or "Miserable MotherFu@#er", of which he is quite literally both.
Vindications of the Senator are no doubt about to be forthcoming from Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly, and "MMF" works well in the abbreviated text of Twitter.
Have a nice day... with your neighbor's wife.
Friday, June 19, 2009
Inharmonious
Both Paul Krugman (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/19/opinion/19krugman.html?_r=1&th&emc=th)
this morning in the NYT, and Robert Reich (http://robertreich.blogspot.com/)
in his blog posted on 6/18, indicate that they are not happy with the compromise and short-sighted nature of Obama’s proposals for over-hauling the economy and our financial policies. They both indicate that the proposal is not real reform or even anything like it. The news reports on NPR (npr.org) and other articles in the NYT and the WaPo would seem to express the same disappointment. I would like to hear what both Galbraith and Greider have to say, but I have not found anything yet this morning. My first guess is that they would both concur with Krugman and Reich, and that Grieder will be much more pessimistic and critical. And I am willing to bet that Bill Maher (Real Time, HBO, Fri. nite, 10:00 P.M.EST) will have grand time with this debacle tonight.
David Sirota has a piece in Truthdig this morning (http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090618_daring_to_dream/) and I have entered a long comment there, about governmental small thinking, semantics ( you cannot literally “re-invent” anything) and the fact that if we do not come up with some new ideas, new solutions and new approaches to the challenges of the modern world, we will be constrained to remain Neanderthals, waiting for the return of the ice age of human ideological survival. That age will be financed, of course, by Lehman Bros. and have really piss poor health care.
Happy Juneteenth.
this morning in the NYT, and Robert Reich (http://robertreich.blogspot.com/)
in his blog posted on 6/18, indicate that they are not happy with the compromise and short-sighted nature of Obama’s proposals for over-hauling the economy and our financial policies. They both indicate that the proposal is not real reform or even anything like it. The news reports on NPR (npr.org) and other articles in the NYT and the WaPo would seem to express the same disappointment. I would like to hear what both Galbraith and Greider have to say, but I have not found anything yet this morning. My first guess is that they would both concur with Krugman and Reich, and that Grieder will be much more pessimistic and critical. And I am willing to bet that Bill Maher (Real Time, HBO, Fri. nite, 10:00 P.M.EST) will have grand time with this debacle tonight.
David Sirota has a piece in Truthdig this morning (http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090618_daring_to_dream/) and I have entered a long comment there, about governmental small thinking, semantics ( you cannot literally “re-invent” anything) and the fact that if we do not come up with some new ideas, new solutions and new approaches to the challenges of the modern world, we will be constrained to remain Neanderthals, waiting for the return of the ice age of human ideological survival. That age will be financed, of course, by Lehman Bros. and have really piss poor health care.
Happy Juneteenth.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
The Man Who Isn't Here
There may well be some terrible and urgent truth to the saying, “The more things change, the more they stay the same”. The word ‘change” stings harshly this morning. The President is not here: he is in France, or Cairo or Buchenwald or Canton or Green Bay. Or on a date night. In reality he has been thrown into a toy store. Like W was, he has so many toys to play with, that he appears overwhelmed. He plays with each economic or military toy just enough to leave is fingerprints on them but not enough to learn to use any effectively enough to bring about change. I had hoped for better.
http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/yes-i-can/?ref=opinion. I was just thinking a few days ago, the President keeps talking about “my” Secretary of State, “my “ Secretary of Defense and “my” financial advisors. Funny: I thought they were “our” government officials and employees. I don’t much care to see Obama’s birth certificate, but I would like to see the bill of sale that shows that we sold him the whole country. His ego (like W’s) suddenly runneth over, he has appears to have forgotten he got hired for this job (not annointed) and works for us. He did not buy the United States like he bought General Motors. I hope he does not sell us to the Italians.
http://progressive.org/wx060909.html. Emanuel does not only appear undisciplined, but seems like the reincarnation of Karl Rove, the junkyard dog. He is unpredictably brash and his behavior betrays bias, brusqueness and angry aggression. He is as reassuring and comforting as falling into a prickly pear. As a right hand man for change, he belies a left-handed skullduggery-business-as- usual. He is a brutal reaffirmation of the politics-as-usual status quo. He is very much here, the President is not.
http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/21632. This is just one essay that describes why the POTUS is all “all hat and no cattle”. His speeches, though eloquent and carefully crafted, lack substance and follow-though. We just spent eight years receiving the same disinformation from W, except it came in the form of sentence fragments and poor grammar. “Walking the walk” is very hard to do when you are not even in the room.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31232667/
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/140570/stop_being_distracted_by_loudmouths_like_limbaugh%3A_the_real_problem_is_lousy_democrats_like_evan_bayh_and_ben_nelson/.
http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/140489/we%27re_screwed_on_everything_from_health_care_to_the_economy_if_the_dems_don%27t_shape_up/
http://www.alternet.org/world/140526/bill_moyers%3A_the_rise_of_private_armies_--_mercenaries%2C_murder_and_corruption_in_iraq_and_afghanistan/
I know this is more material than you want to read (or attempt to) in one sitting. But the sum and substance is roughly this: Show business, glitz, glamour and razzle-dazzle are alive and well with this Presidency, as in the last. The promised change, transparency and grit are totally absent, glossed over and hidden by flowery speeches and dog and pony shows. The President goes today to Green Bay, WI, to talk up health care reform. Why? To what end? This will help this cause as much as his trip to Elkhart, IN helped to re-vitalize the RV industry. Someone should remind him that he promised to actually listen to the citizenry and not stage-manage a diversionary tactic that tries to hide the nasty ambitions of big health and big pharma. He is not here. He is out to lunch while the legislators have lunch with the AMA, Eli Lilly and Pfizer.
The real problem is lousy democrats. Well, doh. The president exerts none of the sway of his office over his own party members, who are still wedded to big industry and finance. Did he learn nothing from Ronald Reagan? He welcomes the traitor-like likes of Arlen Specter, does nothing to limit the incoherencies of Nancy and Harry and Louise and offers no resistance to the Blue Dogs, who are more cur dogs than blue. And he should pull Lieberman and Graham into the Oval Office and read them the disciplinary riot act that is so long over-due. We are screwed…if the democrats don’t shape up. Same story, new page. The President fails repeatedly to listen to wise observers like Grieder and Richard Wolff and Krugman, who might make a difference and enable real change, and instead surrounds himself with old-line defenders of the “way things used to be”, like Biden, Geithner, and Jaba the Summers and uses Hillary Clinton as a lightning rod and innocuous pacifier.
Private armies and mercenaries: The wars and rumors of wars rage on and continue international carnage and promote ill-will, no matter what vagaries the President spouts from a pulpit in Cairo. At the current rate of the loss of hope and procrastination of change, Guantanamo will still be open for business in two years, new black-ops detention/torture centers will be open in other locales and we will soon own a second billion dollar embassy/fortress/stronghold in Afghanistan. Think what you will about the Taliban, Pakistan and nuclear weapons proliferation.
The youngish rising star of Midwestern politics strode onto the scene and emailed and twittered and sweet-talked his way into the hearts and minds of the younger voting populace. Then, through his promises and spell-binding “speechifyin’” ( stunning in contrast to his predecessor I see now in retrospect), he made the boomers stand at the window in the maternity ward and gloat over the newborn in the crib, up front and center. He was there for that.
The economic slide is still sliding, the foreclosures are closing in on human habitation, and, in a fashion no less blatant in its use of distractions, fanfare and hoopla than that of the previous administration, there is no evidence of new thinking and new solutions to new problems which have outgrown and overwhelmed the old approaches. As this possible” new way forward” is ignored, any real opportunity for that once super-hyped hope and change will rapidly fade. Where is that guy?
Obama is the man who is not here. I know that many people hate to hear me say this, but I have to agree with Mr. Greider: if Mr. Obama does not get on the stick, if he does not start singing from the songbook he sang from to get elected, and dancing with the girls who brung him, we are screwed.
http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/yes-i-can/?ref=opinion. I was just thinking a few days ago, the President keeps talking about “my” Secretary of State, “my “ Secretary of Defense and “my” financial advisors. Funny: I thought they were “our” government officials and employees. I don’t much care to see Obama’s birth certificate, but I would like to see the bill of sale that shows that we sold him the whole country. His ego (like W’s) suddenly runneth over, he has appears to have forgotten he got hired for this job (not annointed) and works for us. He did not buy the United States like he bought General Motors. I hope he does not sell us to the Italians.
http://progressive.org/wx060909.html. Emanuel does not only appear undisciplined, but seems like the reincarnation of Karl Rove, the junkyard dog. He is unpredictably brash and his behavior betrays bias, brusqueness and angry aggression. He is as reassuring and comforting as falling into a prickly pear. As a right hand man for change, he belies a left-handed skullduggery-business-as- usual. He is a brutal reaffirmation of the politics-as-usual status quo. He is very much here, the President is not.
http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/21632. This is just one essay that describes why the POTUS is all “all hat and no cattle”. His speeches, though eloquent and carefully crafted, lack substance and follow-though. We just spent eight years receiving the same disinformation from W, except it came in the form of sentence fragments and poor grammar. “Walking the walk” is very hard to do when you are not even in the room.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31232667/
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/140570/stop_being_distracted_by_loudmouths_like_limbaugh%3A_the_real_problem_is_lousy_democrats_like_evan_bayh_and_ben_nelson/.
http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/140489/we%27re_screwed_on_everything_from_health_care_to_the_economy_if_the_dems_don%27t_shape_up/
http://www.alternet.org/world/140526/bill_moyers%3A_the_rise_of_private_armies_--_mercenaries%2C_murder_and_corruption_in_iraq_and_afghanistan/
I know this is more material than you want to read (or attempt to) in one sitting. But the sum and substance is roughly this: Show business, glitz, glamour and razzle-dazzle are alive and well with this Presidency, as in the last. The promised change, transparency and grit are totally absent, glossed over and hidden by flowery speeches and dog and pony shows. The President goes today to Green Bay, WI, to talk up health care reform. Why? To what end? This will help this cause as much as his trip to Elkhart, IN helped to re-vitalize the RV industry. Someone should remind him that he promised to actually listen to the citizenry and not stage-manage a diversionary tactic that tries to hide the nasty ambitions of big health and big pharma. He is not here. He is out to lunch while the legislators have lunch with the AMA, Eli Lilly and Pfizer.
The real problem is lousy democrats. Well, doh. The president exerts none of the sway of his office over his own party members, who are still wedded to big industry and finance. Did he learn nothing from Ronald Reagan? He welcomes the traitor-like likes of Arlen Specter, does nothing to limit the incoherencies of Nancy and Harry and Louise and offers no resistance to the Blue Dogs, who are more cur dogs than blue. And he should pull Lieberman and Graham into the Oval Office and read them the disciplinary riot act that is so long over-due. We are screwed…if the democrats don’t shape up. Same story, new page. The President fails repeatedly to listen to wise observers like Grieder and Richard Wolff and Krugman, who might make a difference and enable real change, and instead surrounds himself with old-line defenders of the “way things used to be”, like Biden, Geithner, and Jaba the Summers and uses Hillary Clinton as a lightning rod and innocuous pacifier.
Private armies and mercenaries: The wars and rumors of wars rage on and continue international carnage and promote ill-will, no matter what vagaries the President spouts from a pulpit in Cairo. At the current rate of the loss of hope and procrastination of change, Guantanamo will still be open for business in two years, new black-ops detention/torture centers will be open in other locales and we will soon own a second billion dollar embassy/fortress/stronghold in Afghanistan. Think what you will about the Taliban, Pakistan and nuclear weapons proliferation.
The youngish rising star of Midwestern politics strode onto the scene and emailed and twittered and sweet-talked his way into the hearts and minds of the younger voting populace. Then, through his promises and spell-binding “speechifyin’” ( stunning in contrast to his predecessor I see now in retrospect), he made the boomers stand at the window in the maternity ward and gloat over the newborn in the crib, up front and center. He was there for that.
The economic slide is still sliding, the foreclosures are closing in on human habitation, and, in a fashion no less blatant in its use of distractions, fanfare and hoopla than that of the previous administration, there is no evidence of new thinking and new solutions to new problems which have outgrown and overwhelmed the old approaches. As this possible” new way forward” is ignored, any real opportunity for that once super-hyped hope and change will rapidly fade. Where is that guy?
Obama is the man who is not here. I know that many people hate to hear me say this, but I have to agree with Mr. Greider: if Mr. Obama does not get on the stick, if he does not start singing from the songbook he sang from to get elected, and dancing with the girls who brung him, we are screwed.
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Nobody Likes The Truth
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090608_hold_your_applause/
Many people do not like Mr. Hedges, because of his stance on religion, but when he tells the truth and explains ugliness and indefensible cruelty for what it is, you must give him some space. I concur with this, almost without reservation.
There is no excuse for torture and even less for continued wars that decimate civilian populations with robot bombs (check the cartoon by Mr. Fish…how appropriate). One commenter cautions that the President moves “slowly and thought fully”. I think not. He hardly moves at all and is, as we say in Texas, “All hat and no cattle”. Eloquent speeches save no lives and he does not move slowly: in fact he does not move at all. He ensures that the status will remain very, very quo. He continues to offer the hot air-euphoria of hope while short-changing reality.
Our foreign and humanitarian policies are duplicitous, xenophobic, prejudiced and myopic. Speaking out of both sides of our mouth, in Bush-like protected environments of suppression and repression, will become a venomous snake that will come around to bite us on the backside. Anti-American sentiment will continue to grow and tensions will rise to a boiling point, at which time the tide will turn against and overrun our smug arrogance and feigned innocence, the ugliness will turn against us and everyone will be scratching their heads (and their asses), and be asking, “Hey what happened?” Well, what happened was that we abandoned liberty and freedom and justice for all. And we called it democracy.
Many people do not like Mr. Hedges, because of his stance on religion, but when he tells the truth and explains ugliness and indefensible cruelty for what it is, you must give him some space. I concur with this, almost without reservation.
There is no excuse for torture and even less for continued wars that decimate civilian populations with robot bombs (check the cartoon by Mr. Fish…how appropriate). One commenter cautions that the President moves “slowly and thought fully”. I think not. He hardly moves at all and is, as we say in Texas, “All hat and no cattle”. Eloquent speeches save no lives and he does not move slowly: in fact he does not move at all. He ensures that the status will remain very, very quo. He continues to offer the hot air-euphoria of hope while short-changing reality.
Our foreign and humanitarian policies are duplicitous, xenophobic, prejudiced and myopic. Speaking out of both sides of our mouth, in Bush-like protected environments of suppression and repression, will become a venomous snake that will come around to bite us on the backside. Anti-American sentiment will continue to grow and tensions will rise to a boiling point, at which time the tide will turn against and overrun our smug arrogance and feigned innocence, the ugliness will turn against us and everyone will be scratching their heads (and their asses), and be asking, “Hey what happened?” Well, what happened was that we abandoned liberty and freedom and justice for all. And we called it democracy.
Monday, June 8, 2009
A Metaphor?
Air France flight 447 is a metapohor for the U.S. economy. It has crashed in a huge sea of debt and we have sent out an armada of financial rescue vehicles. Sadly, Capt. Geithner and First Officer Summers are in charge, and all they have managed to do is find dead bodies and the wreckage of the old ship of state. And they have blamed the crash on the Greenspan/Paulson air speed sensors. You might draw parallels between the number of bodies recovered (16?), the total number still missing and the job loss rates. Dog paddling lessons are recommended
Saturday, June 6, 2009
The New American Mythology: Boy. Are We In Trouble
The citizens of the United States, in this, the first part of the 21rst century, are living in a land of make-believe. We are making our way through every day, pretending to have our lives dependent upon, and grounded in, two myth-guided (sorry), retrograde and faulty suppositions. The first one revolves around the once-sacred notion of “democracy”; the second hinges on the modern misconception of “progress”. Boy. Are we in trouble.
For most of the last century, and most especially during the last decade, we were all sent to bed with visions of terrorists and catastrophe dancing in our heads. We have been told, taught, propagandized into believing and cajoled into maintaining a trance-like mental state that stated that democracy was the answer to everything. Well, it’s not. This is 2009, and panaceas are as dead as Kelsey’s nuts (Ask Bill Maher). The predominant notion has been that any nation in the world which did not already have a democratic form of government should be made to have one, whether it wanted one or not. If a nation did not seem willing to accept democracy as way of life and government, it would have democracy imposed upon it, bribed to accept it or bullied into it through the imposition of a titular administrator (Iran) who could be paid enough to abide by the general norms of democratic life in America(think Egypt). Of course there was also the technique of employing a totalitarian military onslaught, designed to end in “democratic” submission (This oftentimes failed: I give you Viet Nam and Iraq). This particular form of retrograde thinking is our continued salute to the British Empire. I thought we were done with them? But gosh: look at how well all that worked out for them in India.)
There are many rationales for this sort of thinking. First of all, if every nation in the world was democratic, it was supposed to mean that we would not have any enemies. This would be enhanced by the fact since we had “converted” them to democracy, they would be forever thankful and love us unconditionally. This thankfulness and eternal affection would come about, we believed, for one reason: everyone knows (or is supposed to) that democracy works. This “given” is precisely the fly in the ointment, the wrench in the works, and the shoe in the machinery. This idea is its own sabotage. Contrary to popular mythology, democracy does not automatically guarantee bliss, equal wealth and happiness. All too often it works just the other way around: bliss, contentment and happiness only come well after you have worked hard enough to establish real democracy.
And incidentally, democracy and Christianity were not born as conjoined twins. In fact, they are not even kissing cousins. That is just one thread in the fabric of the new American mythology, and one which has proven disruptive, dangerous and toxic in the culture wars (see below). So don’t try to hit me with your Bible.
Why any population, governmental body or group of sane individuals would actually want democracy because it works, is beyond me. The prime example of why this set of beliefs is fallacious is the current, sad state of democracy in the United States. Nearly every day, democracy in this country is failing us. There are many causes for this continual failure, but it all boils down to just two.
The first is that democracy in America is now governed by very weak ideas or ideas that have already died (read The Tyranny of Dead Ideas, Matt Miller. “Taxes will go down”: not). Nearly every day, people in decision making positions at every level of every government make decisions based upon old, stale, faulty, worn-out and ineffective and grossly inappropriate ideas. They prolong sloth and waste. They perpetuate bad habits and injustice. They foster and breed misery and injustice. Democracy in the United States is broken, in large part because it relies upon out-moded ideas, problem solving without adequate forethought and ideas which no longer “fit” our needs and realities. Our thinking tries to apply the solutions of ages past to the new age of the internet, global warming, international mercantilism and financial terrorism. Our ideas are no longer appropriate to the age in which we live. We seem to keep forgetting that learning from history also means that simply repeating it is most often a mistake. (These decision makers are almost invariably the reason we have those little signs that say, “Plan ahead”, and the last letters are jammed together because the sign space is too short.)
Put somewhat differently: information travels 50 times faster than it did five years ago; we are outstripping our planet’s resources and/or polluting them at a rate which may leave the succeeding populations dying of hunger, thirst and heat in just a few decades; the world’s goods are no longer produced “locally” anywhere on the planet, which has caused massive shifts in work force locales and wealth distribution; the titans of industry are still acting like this is 1925 in America; bankers still manage money and capital like it is still 1850..and all the while, our democratic government ( which many say is “too big”) is using thinking which is “too small”. Instead of governing by thinking in bigger, new and healthy ideas, which are in turn big enough to embrace, regulate, manage, coordinate and respond to all the changes evident in the 21rst century, it thinks only in ways that accommodate all of the strategically inappropriate, and outmoded cultural behaviors just outlined. We are dying from an overdose of status quo. Instead of being Darwinian, and evolving to keep pace with contemporary cultural and economic developments, the government is remaining a carnivorous dinosaur and hatching the same old eggs, day after day. And if you continue to reproduce the same old same old, and ignore the incoming asteroids…well, you get the idea. Boy. Are we in trouble?
A side note: when the overriding government practices and prolongation of this mythology are pervasive and unavoidable, the population tends to drink deeply the toxic wine of nostalgia. They long for today to be yesterday, this month to be last month, or this year to be last year: those were the times they (we) understood and could cope with, without extra thinking, configuring, concentration or devoting time to problem solving or adaptation. But that is another essay.
However, this national pastime of drinking the old wine generally tends to lead to the election and (sadly) re-election of politicians who have learned to benefit from the hangover effect of nostalgia: Politicians who can continuously reinvigorate the vision of the happiness of what was once (thought and remembered) to be “good”, can manage to live long and prosper in this environment, as long as no one discovers the dinosaur eggs. And because everything is relative, i.e., everything is connected to everything else, when you link up that political marketing-prolongation strategy with the antiquated financial institutions, heavily laden themselves with motives of self-preservation and irrepressible greed, you get the main component of broken democracy: politicians who are bought and sold and no longer represent the very people whom they can thank for their office. As such, they become the main catalysts and perpetuators of stale and dead ideas and keep the dinosaur eggs warm. And they keep telling us that taxes will go down. Boy. Are we in trouble.
Another side note or two: If the notion that making, causing or insisting that every nation be democratic will make everyone love us were to be true at all, it would seem to follow that we would need less military might. In reality, one enormous proof of our stale and inappropriate ideas, and the influence of the financial communities, is the existence of the largest military industrial complex in the history of the world. And the United States has the largest military budget in the world, which is wildly disproportionate to the GDP. The Navy, for example (a huge component of the military) is today largely irrelevant. It consists in the main (on the main?) of floating city/state airports and skulking, stealthy black atomic powered and armed submarines which carry enough firepower to scorch the face of the earth many times over. And just recently the Secretary of Defense “defended” (how ironic) his re-allocation of military weapons funding by explaining to the American people (you and me) that now funding would be distributed more “appropriately” amongst conventional weaponry, unconventional weaponry and weapons of “future conventionality”(or some crap like that). This political hot-air and antiquated thinking is all stale and wrong-headed. It is buried in the past. It is lethal nostalgia. Nuclear armed submarines, robot drone airpower and laser guided missiles fired from another continent still do the “same old, same old”: they kill lots of people indiscriminately and without feeling or emotion or responsibility. And our “bought and paid for”, not-fairly-elected politicians perpetuate this not-any-longer-here world of non-thinking. This is not the democracy envisioned by Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams and Benjamin Franklin. Their democracy, especially as viewed by Jefferson, periodically revised, refreshed and re-invented itself through the infusion of new ideas. By breaking with England, they were declaring war on the regurgitation of old ideas and ways of life. Where did that get to? Boy. Are we in trouble.
Which brings us to the second tear in the fabric of the new mythology: the fallacy of the idea of “progress”? You might be led to think (there is a very funny book by Texas author Kinky Friedman, called, You Can Lead a Politician To Water, But You Can’t Make Him Think), that what with the speed of electronic communication, the daily exponential advances and discoveries in health and science and the increasingly sophisticated developments in manufacturing, that we would be moving forward, making progress, as a civilization. Not so. For several reasons, we are, as far the economy, the culture, race and healthcare, running backwards. The United States is in retrograde. We are suffering from self-imposed entropy. Boy. We are in trouble.
In large part, precisely because politicians can zero in on the power of the elixir of nostalgia, moving (in fact very nearly rushing) backwards has been promoted and disguised as moving forward: only skillful politicians can turn wine onto water and make you pay extra for it. After we rolled out of the conflicted legal ideas and moral concepts of the Nixon years, and muddled through the doldrums of Jimmy Carter, we strode into the Reagan years, the first Bush era and later on to Bush II, wherein the operative word was “fear”. (I have not forgotten Bill Clinton. His administration capitalized on the unrealistic giddiness of not being gripped by fear. Please read on). The Reagan gang sought to make us afraid of “big govmint” (yet another example of small thinking). As such, they went about demolishing government structures, union organizations and regulations that kept affairs in order, financially. The Reagan crowd made the term “general welfare” obsolete. The first Bush was still fighting the cold war, telling us to fear oil shortages, threats to democracy, fear losing the Saudis (his bankers), middle-eastern madmen and lack of military might (all old, stale and moribund ideas). The second Bush took all this much farther, urging us to fear (post 9/11) Arab/Muslim terrorists, even more oil loss, WMD’s, loss of jobs, unknown threats to democracy and the potential failure of fundamental Christianity to save the western world (interestingly, we were told to trust his ‘gut” instead of his faith. Oops). We were also told we were too stupid to defend ourselves, and that we needed wars and a larger military industrial complex to protect us and that Dick Cheney should supervise that from an undisclosed location, while W cleared brush on the ranch and fed his pet goat. The only lasting and tangible net result of all of this is that you cannot board an airplane without taking your shoes off. Yes. Trouble. Us.
Naomi Klein, in her book, The Shock Doctrine, explains this nicely. To loosely paraphrase, the mentality throughout these years was this: as long as the population was kept in a state of “shock”, kept constantly on edge and worried, driven by a non-descript fear of anything and everything that moved, it would approve of, support, fund and be complicit in almost anything (like torture?). These would include bigger military budgets, increased laxity in and inattention to financial affairs, more deregulation, distorted human rights and a decrease in both social services and concern for the environment. Deplorable, politicized and inept Ashcroft/Gonzo judicial malfeasance did not help. The net result of all of this was that we have moved backwards. Our social and financial institutions have gone retrograde.
If your neck hurts, it is from looking backward over your shoulder, too much.
(Many will argue these following points, but… during the Clinton years, the smiling, happy mantra of the big guy in the White House were that “Happy Days are here again”. FDR and the cigar had returned and we largely ignored the failure of the movement to make any progress on the biggest “old-thinking” gorilla-in-the-room we had (and still have), which was health care. In the years that followed, health care has gone retrograde even more, but we were too busy being in shock to pay attention. Fast forward to 2008-2009: We were told that we could rescue ourselves from fear and escape from the tendrils of shock by embracing “hope and change”. The electorate chose that and now there is a not-quite-as-big big guy in the White House who smokes cigarettes instead of cigars and hope is fading as change seems to be more and more elusive every day: military strategies and spending appear unchanged, financial woes grow more woeful every day (it is too early to tell yet whether Obama is bought and paid for, but he hired Larry Summers and is moving along the same path from normal beginnings to millionaire, just like Bill and Hillary Clinton) , unemployment grows by leaps and bounds, health care becomes more expensive and less available all the time, and the much-vaulted “progress” (change) has yet to make an appearance. Perhaps what occurred is that “Happy Days Are Here Again” was merely replaced by ,”Happy Days Will Return Again”, which, of course, they never will. Tomorrow will never be yesterday and such thinking is deceptive and retrograde.
Consider this: another old, stale and obsolete idea is that you should “keep your enemies closer”. That is bullshit. You should keep your enemies (and the enemies of the people) at bay by pummeling them with honesty and strong doses of reality. Instead, Obama retained a Secretary of Defense who has prehistoric thinking, has brought the health care industry to the table (so?), appointed banker-foxes to oversee banker-foxes who are living n the chicken coops rent-free, placed Neolithic-reasoning conservatives in positions of national and international influence. Then he placed Hillary, the wife of our last unrealistic master of Make Believe and mythology (President Clinton), who is his unabashed and outspoken arch-rival, in charge of international foreign policy. This is all small thinking. It is nothing new. It is not change. It is com-promise without the promise. So far, no good. Boy. In trouble we are.
To go into retrograde mode means that you are moving backwards and deteriorating. But few seem to be noticing. Experiencing entropy is the same phenomenon only worse: energy and essence disappear without any hope of being renewed, ever. The United States is in clearly in retrograde, as can be clearly observed in several key areas: the military posture, the economy, race relations and cultural “dumbing down”: it is all an entropy of our collective consciousness.
The military budget and stance are either static or growing. The recent military budgets have increased rather than decreased (more backwards disguised as frontwards), we still have two major wars in progress and we are building more aircraft carriers and submarines. We still have Blackwater in our employ. We have a billion dollar embassy of dubious value and usefulness in Baghdad and are building another in Islamabad…for another billion dollars. Our military efforts are moving backwards in terms of real-life usefulness while claiming progress. And we have 50,000 troops stationed in Germany? The less we are supposed to need the military, the more we feed it. This is regress, not progress. We are being snookered. Boy. Are we in trouble.
The economy is upside down and running in reverse. We continue to used borrowed money and increase future debt loads by giving money to bankers (whose old thinking, combined with deregulation, failed) to ensure that they can continue doing what they have always been doing ( the definition, according to Einstein, of course, of “insanity”). This will guarantee that nothing will change; the bankers will not be required to embrace any new ideas and can remain comfortably ensconced in their old thinking. (Read anything by Paul Krugman). The banking and auto industry bail-out programs have been sold as life support systems, to be used to keep the patient alive until it can breathe on its own. Instead the money is flowing upward, padding banker’s coffers, rewarding them for thinking in antiquated fashion, instead of flowing (trickling?) downward, into the economy at large. Some of it is even going out of the country altogether (GM will build its next “profitable” car in China?). This is retrograde, entropic disintegration at its best. Boy. Are we in trouble.
Racism, bigotry, ethno-centrism and xenophobia are at their worst and getting worse than that. Black men are blamed for everything and universally labeled as drug dealers; people of (any) color are held in suspicion, arrested for almost no reason and routinely jailed for practically nothing: the United States has the highest per capita rate of incarceration of any country in the civilized world. Our fear of immigrants has never been more heightened and we have been conditioned to believe that any Muslim is a terrorist and an infidel (Contrary to current rumors, the Quran is no more a “how-to” manual for killing people than is the Bible: read them both). The membership rolls of racist, ultra-right wing hate organizations have exploded and the Reagan-era defamatory slurs about “welfare mothers driving Cadillacs” are everywhere again. I receive at least one cartoon or joke on my computer each week, equivocating the POTUS with a monkey. This is retrograde human relations. Anyone who thinks this is progress needs to seek professional help. Boy. Are we in trouble.
But beneath nearly all of this is our cultural retrograde. What many call the “culture wars”, it is an expression of the right-wing, left-wing bifurcation that expresses itself in poorly thought-through positions on guns, abortion, the immorality of war, the justification for greed and religion , all run amok. Pick one. Charles Pierce has written book called, Idiot America, subtitled, “The culture wars are over and the idiots have won”. I have not read it yet, but if what he said while being interviewed on television is any indicator, I had better read it soon. Pierce’s observations go hand in hand with the now-long standing trend in the U.S. identified as “anti-intellectualism”. As daily life becomes ever more difficult, we are admonished to, for heavens’ sake, whatever you do, DON”T THINK! To do so might mean you might learn something, your head might hurt, you might have to forego or give up a prejudice and might have to face the reality that tomorrow can and never will be yesterday. Idiots employ that faulty reasoning and huge cross-sections of the population follow that course (It cannot be called a train of thought, because the boiler in the engine is cold). The O’Reillys, the Limbaughs, Inhofes, Steeles, McConnels and Boehners live for, in and of this misconstrued vision of reality and misunderstanding of the basic constructs of our cultural milieu. And they all believe that taxes will go down, as well. And before you get all excited, there are many questions about Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi (and other liberals), as well. Curiously, but hardly surprising, the Democrats have found the very same night deposit box at the bank that the Republicans use.
In the past several months, after the TARP intervention, the banking industry has reportedly spent more millions on lobbyists and legislative contributions than has been spent for welfare and food stamps in most major U.S. cities. Google let me down here: I can’t find the source.
When you think in retrograde, you get retrograde, backwards, non-progressive and entropic results. Such non-thinking turns in on itself and becomes hugely counter-productive. Retrograde thinking and behavior allows you to continue to believe that being a white, Anglo-Saxon male who suppresses female, gender and minority rights is “OK”. It’s not. In the whole of the world, in the “big picture”, being that white Anglo just described increasingly means you are increasingly becoming a minority. And Jesus did not have blonde hair and blue eyes, did not handle snakes, was probably a progressive Jew who may have been black and “Aryan” is the derivative form of the word “Iranian”, which means your great, great, great grandfather may have been a camel-riding “towelhead”. Get over it. Get over all of it. But yes, I know: if the idiots have won, this has all been a big waste of time.
Our democracy is a broken mythology (largely because of money) and its failure to function has joined forces with anti-intellectualism and idiots to impede and deny what is now mythological progress. Boy. Are we in trouble?
This just in (compliments of Clint): http://www.openleft.com/diary/13658/the-human-development-indexa-better-measure-of-where-we-stand. Yes. Are we in trouble.
For most of the last century, and most especially during the last decade, we were all sent to bed with visions of terrorists and catastrophe dancing in our heads. We have been told, taught, propagandized into believing and cajoled into maintaining a trance-like mental state that stated that democracy was the answer to everything. Well, it’s not. This is 2009, and panaceas are as dead as Kelsey’s nuts (Ask Bill Maher). The predominant notion has been that any nation in the world which did not already have a democratic form of government should be made to have one, whether it wanted one or not. If a nation did not seem willing to accept democracy as way of life and government, it would have democracy imposed upon it, bribed to accept it or bullied into it through the imposition of a titular administrator (Iran) who could be paid enough to abide by the general norms of democratic life in America(think Egypt). Of course there was also the technique of employing a totalitarian military onslaught, designed to end in “democratic” submission (This oftentimes failed: I give you Viet Nam and Iraq). This particular form of retrograde thinking is our continued salute to the British Empire. I thought we were done with them? But gosh: look at how well all that worked out for them in India.)
There are many rationales for this sort of thinking. First of all, if every nation in the world was democratic, it was supposed to mean that we would not have any enemies. This would be enhanced by the fact since we had “converted” them to democracy, they would be forever thankful and love us unconditionally. This thankfulness and eternal affection would come about, we believed, for one reason: everyone knows (or is supposed to) that democracy works. This “given” is precisely the fly in the ointment, the wrench in the works, and the shoe in the machinery. This idea is its own sabotage. Contrary to popular mythology, democracy does not automatically guarantee bliss, equal wealth and happiness. All too often it works just the other way around: bliss, contentment and happiness only come well after you have worked hard enough to establish real democracy.
And incidentally, democracy and Christianity were not born as conjoined twins. In fact, they are not even kissing cousins. That is just one thread in the fabric of the new American mythology, and one which has proven disruptive, dangerous and toxic in the culture wars (see below). So don’t try to hit me with your Bible.
Why any population, governmental body or group of sane individuals would actually want democracy because it works, is beyond me. The prime example of why this set of beliefs is fallacious is the current, sad state of democracy in the United States. Nearly every day, democracy in this country is failing us. There are many causes for this continual failure, but it all boils down to just two.
The first is that democracy in America is now governed by very weak ideas or ideas that have already died (read The Tyranny of Dead Ideas, Matt Miller. “Taxes will go down”: not). Nearly every day, people in decision making positions at every level of every government make decisions based upon old, stale, faulty, worn-out and ineffective and grossly inappropriate ideas. They prolong sloth and waste. They perpetuate bad habits and injustice. They foster and breed misery and injustice. Democracy in the United States is broken, in large part because it relies upon out-moded ideas, problem solving without adequate forethought and ideas which no longer “fit” our needs and realities. Our thinking tries to apply the solutions of ages past to the new age of the internet, global warming, international mercantilism and financial terrorism. Our ideas are no longer appropriate to the age in which we live. We seem to keep forgetting that learning from history also means that simply repeating it is most often a mistake. (These decision makers are almost invariably the reason we have those little signs that say, “Plan ahead”, and the last letters are jammed together because the sign space is too short.)
Put somewhat differently: information travels 50 times faster than it did five years ago; we are outstripping our planet’s resources and/or polluting them at a rate which may leave the succeeding populations dying of hunger, thirst and heat in just a few decades; the world’s goods are no longer produced “locally” anywhere on the planet, which has caused massive shifts in work force locales and wealth distribution; the titans of industry are still acting like this is 1925 in America; bankers still manage money and capital like it is still 1850..and all the while, our democratic government ( which many say is “too big”) is using thinking which is “too small”. Instead of governing by thinking in bigger, new and healthy ideas, which are in turn big enough to embrace, regulate, manage, coordinate and respond to all the changes evident in the 21rst century, it thinks only in ways that accommodate all of the strategically inappropriate, and outmoded cultural behaviors just outlined. We are dying from an overdose of status quo. Instead of being Darwinian, and evolving to keep pace with contemporary cultural and economic developments, the government is remaining a carnivorous dinosaur and hatching the same old eggs, day after day. And if you continue to reproduce the same old same old, and ignore the incoming asteroids…well, you get the idea. Boy. Are we in trouble?
A side note: when the overriding government practices and prolongation of this mythology are pervasive and unavoidable, the population tends to drink deeply the toxic wine of nostalgia. They long for today to be yesterday, this month to be last month, or this year to be last year: those were the times they (we) understood and could cope with, without extra thinking, configuring, concentration or devoting time to problem solving or adaptation. But that is another essay.
However, this national pastime of drinking the old wine generally tends to lead to the election and (sadly) re-election of politicians who have learned to benefit from the hangover effect of nostalgia: Politicians who can continuously reinvigorate the vision of the happiness of what was once (thought and remembered) to be “good”, can manage to live long and prosper in this environment, as long as no one discovers the dinosaur eggs. And because everything is relative, i.e., everything is connected to everything else, when you link up that political marketing-prolongation strategy with the antiquated financial institutions, heavily laden themselves with motives of self-preservation and irrepressible greed, you get the main component of broken democracy: politicians who are bought and sold and no longer represent the very people whom they can thank for their office. As such, they become the main catalysts and perpetuators of stale and dead ideas and keep the dinosaur eggs warm. And they keep telling us that taxes will go down. Boy. Are we in trouble.
Another side note or two: If the notion that making, causing or insisting that every nation be democratic will make everyone love us were to be true at all, it would seem to follow that we would need less military might. In reality, one enormous proof of our stale and inappropriate ideas, and the influence of the financial communities, is the existence of the largest military industrial complex in the history of the world. And the United States has the largest military budget in the world, which is wildly disproportionate to the GDP. The Navy, for example (a huge component of the military) is today largely irrelevant. It consists in the main (on the main?) of floating city/state airports and skulking, stealthy black atomic powered and armed submarines which carry enough firepower to scorch the face of the earth many times over. And just recently the Secretary of Defense “defended” (how ironic) his re-allocation of military weapons funding by explaining to the American people (you and me) that now funding would be distributed more “appropriately” amongst conventional weaponry, unconventional weaponry and weapons of “future conventionality”(or some crap like that). This political hot-air and antiquated thinking is all stale and wrong-headed. It is buried in the past. It is lethal nostalgia. Nuclear armed submarines, robot drone airpower and laser guided missiles fired from another continent still do the “same old, same old”: they kill lots of people indiscriminately and without feeling or emotion or responsibility. And our “bought and paid for”, not-fairly-elected politicians perpetuate this not-any-longer-here world of non-thinking. This is not the democracy envisioned by Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams and Benjamin Franklin. Their democracy, especially as viewed by Jefferson, periodically revised, refreshed and re-invented itself through the infusion of new ideas. By breaking with England, they were declaring war on the regurgitation of old ideas and ways of life. Where did that get to? Boy. Are we in trouble.
Which brings us to the second tear in the fabric of the new mythology: the fallacy of the idea of “progress”? You might be led to think (there is a very funny book by Texas author Kinky Friedman, called, You Can Lead a Politician To Water, But You Can’t Make Him Think), that what with the speed of electronic communication, the daily exponential advances and discoveries in health and science and the increasingly sophisticated developments in manufacturing, that we would be moving forward, making progress, as a civilization. Not so. For several reasons, we are, as far the economy, the culture, race and healthcare, running backwards. The United States is in retrograde. We are suffering from self-imposed entropy. Boy. We are in trouble.
In large part, precisely because politicians can zero in on the power of the elixir of nostalgia, moving (in fact very nearly rushing) backwards has been promoted and disguised as moving forward: only skillful politicians can turn wine onto water and make you pay extra for it. After we rolled out of the conflicted legal ideas and moral concepts of the Nixon years, and muddled through the doldrums of Jimmy Carter, we strode into the Reagan years, the first Bush era and later on to Bush II, wherein the operative word was “fear”. (I have not forgotten Bill Clinton. His administration capitalized on the unrealistic giddiness of not being gripped by fear. Please read on). The Reagan gang sought to make us afraid of “big govmint” (yet another example of small thinking). As such, they went about demolishing government structures, union organizations and regulations that kept affairs in order, financially. The Reagan crowd made the term “general welfare” obsolete. The first Bush was still fighting the cold war, telling us to fear oil shortages, threats to democracy, fear losing the Saudis (his bankers), middle-eastern madmen and lack of military might (all old, stale and moribund ideas). The second Bush took all this much farther, urging us to fear (post 9/11) Arab/Muslim terrorists, even more oil loss, WMD’s, loss of jobs, unknown threats to democracy and the potential failure of fundamental Christianity to save the western world (interestingly, we were told to trust his ‘gut” instead of his faith. Oops). We were also told we were too stupid to defend ourselves, and that we needed wars and a larger military industrial complex to protect us and that Dick Cheney should supervise that from an undisclosed location, while W cleared brush on the ranch and fed his pet goat. The only lasting and tangible net result of all of this is that you cannot board an airplane without taking your shoes off. Yes. Trouble. Us.
Naomi Klein, in her book, The Shock Doctrine, explains this nicely. To loosely paraphrase, the mentality throughout these years was this: as long as the population was kept in a state of “shock”, kept constantly on edge and worried, driven by a non-descript fear of anything and everything that moved, it would approve of, support, fund and be complicit in almost anything (like torture?). These would include bigger military budgets, increased laxity in and inattention to financial affairs, more deregulation, distorted human rights and a decrease in both social services and concern for the environment. Deplorable, politicized and inept Ashcroft/Gonzo judicial malfeasance did not help. The net result of all of this was that we have moved backwards. Our social and financial institutions have gone retrograde.
If your neck hurts, it is from looking backward over your shoulder, too much.
(Many will argue these following points, but… during the Clinton years, the smiling, happy mantra of the big guy in the White House were that “Happy Days are here again”. FDR and the cigar had returned and we largely ignored the failure of the movement to make any progress on the biggest “old-thinking” gorilla-in-the-room we had (and still have), which was health care. In the years that followed, health care has gone retrograde even more, but we were too busy being in shock to pay attention. Fast forward to 2008-2009: We were told that we could rescue ourselves from fear and escape from the tendrils of shock by embracing “hope and change”. The electorate chose that and now there is a not-quite-as-big big guy in the White House who smokes cigarettes instead of cigars and hope is fading as change seems to be more and more elusive every day: military strategies and spending appear unchanged, financial woes grow more woeful every day (it is too early to tell yet whether Obama is bought and paid for, but he hired Larry Summers and is moving along the same path from normal beginnings to millionaire, just like Bill and Hillary Clinton) , unemployment grows by leaps and bounds, health care becomes more expensive and less available all the time, and the much-vaulted “progress” (change) has yet to make an appearance. Perhaps what occurred is that “Happy Days Are Here Again” was merely replaced by ,”Happy Days Will Return Again”, which, of course, they never will. Tomorrow will never be yesterday and such thinking is deceptive and retrograde.
Consider this: another old, stale and obsolete idea is that you should “keep your enemies closer”. That is bullshit. You should keep your enemies (and the enemies of the people) at bay by pummeling them with honesty and strong doses of reality. Instead, Obama retained a Secretary of Defense who has prehistoric thinking, has brought the health care industry to the table (so?), appointed banker-foxes to oversee banker-foxes who are living n the chicken coops rent-free, placed Neolithic-reasoning conservatives in positions of national and international influence. Then he placed Hillary, the wife of our last unrealistic master of Make Believe and mythology (President Clinton), who is his unabashed and outspoken arch-rival, in charge of international foreign policy. This is all small thinking. It is nothing new. It is not change. It is com-promise without the promise. So far, no good. Boy. In trouble we are.
To go into retrograde mode means that you are moving backwards and deteriorating. But few seem to be noticing. Experiencing entropy is the same phenomenon only worse: energy and essence disappear without any hope of being renewed, ever. The United States is in clearly in retrograde, as can be clearly observed in several key areas: the military posture, the economy, race relations and cultural “dumbing down”: it is all an entropy of our collective consciousness.
The military budget and stance are either static or growing. The recent military budgets have increased rather than decreased (more backwards disguised as frontwards), we still have two major wars in progress and we are building more aircraft carriers and submarines. We still have Blackwater in our employ. We have a billion dollar embassy of dubious value and usefulness in Baghdad and are building another in Islamabad…for another billion dollars. Our military efforts are moving backwards in terms of real-life usefulness while claiming progress. And we have 50,000 troops stationed in Germany? The less we are supposed to need the military, the more we feed it. This is regress, not progress. We are being snookered. Boy. Are we in trouble.
The economy is upside down and running in reverse. We continue to used borrowed money and increase future debt loads by giving money to bankers (whose old thinking, combined with deregulation, failed) to ensure that they can continue doing what they have always been doing ( the definition, according to Einstein, of course, of “insanity”). This will guarantee that nothing will change; the bankers will not be required to embrace any new ideas and can remain comfortably ensconced in their old thinking. (Read anything by Paul Krugman). The banking and auto industry bail-out programs have been sold as life support systems, to be used to keep the patient alive until it can breathe on its own. Instead the money is flowing upward, padding banker’s coffers, rewarding them for thinking in antiquated fashion, instead of flowing (trickling?) downward, into the economy at large. Some of it is even going out of the country altogether (GM will build its next “profitable” car in China?). This is retrograde, entropic disintegration at its best. Boy. Are we in trouble.
Racism, bigotry, ethno-centrism and xenophobia are at their worst and getting worse than that. Black men are blamed for everything and universally labeled as drug dealers; people of (any) color are held in suspicion, arrested for almost no reason and routinely jailed for practically nothing: the United States has the highest per capita rate of incarceration of any country in the civilized world. Our fear of immigrants has never been more heightened and we have been conditioned to believe that any Muslim is a terrorist and an infidel (Contrary to current rumors, the Quran is no more a “how-to” manual for killing people than is the Bible: read them both). The membership rolls of racist, ultra-right wing hate organizations have exploded and the Reagan-era defamatory slurs about “welfare mothers driving Cadillacs” are everywhere again. I receive at least one cartoon or joke on my computer each week, equivocating the POTUS with a monkey. This is retrograde human relations. Anyone who thinks this is progress needs to seek professional help. Boy. Are we in trouble.
But beneath nearly all of this is our cultural retrograde. What many call the “culture wars”, it is an expression of the right-wing, left-wing bifurcation that expresses itself in poorly thought-through positions on guns, abortion, the immorality of war, the justification for greed and religion , all run amok. Pick one. Charles Pierce has written book called, Idiot America, subtitled, “The culture wars are over and the idiots have won”. I have not read it yet, but if what he said while being interviewed on television is any indicator, I had better read it soon. Pierce’s observations go hand in hand with the now-long standing trend in the U.S. identified as “anti-intellectualism”. As daily life becomes ever more difficult, we are admonished to, for heavens’ sake, whatever you do, DON”T THINK! To do so might mean you might learn something, your head might hurt, you might have to forego or give up a prejudice and might have to face the reality that tomorrow can and never will be yesterday. Idiots employ that faulty reasoning and huge cross-sections of the population follow that course (It cannot be called a train of thought, because the boiler in the engine is cold). The O’Reillys, the Limbaughs, Inhofes, Steeles, McConnels and Boehners live for, in and of this misconstrued vision of reality and misunderstanding of the basic constructs of our cultural milieu. And they all believe that taxes will go down, as well. And before you get all excited, there are many questions about Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi (and other liberals), as well. Curiously, but hardly surprising, the Democrats have found the very same night deposit box at the bank that the Republicans use.
In the past several months, after the TARP intervention, the banking industry has reportedly spent more millions on lobbyists and legislative contributions than has been spent for welfare and food stamps in most major U.S. cities. Google let me down here: I can’t find the source.
When you think in retrograde, you get retrograde, backwards, non-progressive and entropic results. Such non-thinking turns in on itself and becomes hugely counter-productive. Retrograde thinking and behavior allows you to continue to believe that being a white, Anglo-Saxon male who suppresses female, gender and minority rights is “OK”. It’s not. In the whole of the world, in the “big picture”, being that white Anglo just described increasingly means you are increasingly becoming a minority. And Jesus did not have blonde hair and blue eyes, did not handle snakes, was probably a progressive Jew who may have been black and “Aryan” is the derivative form of the word “Iranian”, which means your great, great, great grandfather may have been a camel-riding “towelhead”. Get over it. Get over all of it. But yes, I know: if the idiots have won, this has all been a big waste of time.
Our democracy is a broken mythology (largely because of money) and its failure to function has joined forces with anti-intellectualism and idiots to impede and deny what is now mythological progress. Boy. Are we in trouble?
This just in (compliments of Clint): http://www.openleft.com/diary/13658/the-human-development-indexa-better-measure-of-where-we-stand. Yes. Are we in trouble.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
